admin's blog

DeVeber is Hiring Summer Interns !

The following job positions are open this summer at the deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research. Please forward to any potential candidates. Note the detailed criteria and timelines below, applications which do not meet the criteria or deadlines will not be reviewed. The deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research is an equal opportunity employer and strongly encourages applications from all students.

Please note that all positions will be paid minimum wage from a Government grant from Canada Summer Jobs. Students must be returning to school in September full-time.

-Preference is given to post-secondary students.  This opportunity is for students aged 15 to 30 years who are enrolled in school for September.

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Spring 2015 Review of Complications

Book Review
 
Abortion’s Impact on Women, by Angela Lanfranchi, Ian Gentles, and Elizabeth Ring-Cassidy, softcover, 433 pp, $29.95, ISBN-13: 978-0920453360, Toronto, Ontario, De Veber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research, 2013.
 
The adverse impact of legally induced abortion on society is apparent, with major demographic and social changes. Greatly increased numbers of legal abortions make this impact on women’s health all the more consequential. This book meets a major need to make these effects known.
 
Demographers distinguish between a first and second demographic transition. The first manifests a reduction in the birth rate from greater use of all kinds of birth control.

Check ethics at the door

Check ethics at the door Re: Doctors’ Beliefs Must Not Impede Care: Ontario College, March 7. Published in National Post.

Something precious was lost when Ontario’s College of Physicians and Surgeons voted to strip doctors of their universally recognized right not to participate in an action that violates a properly formed conscience.

Its arrogance was nicely captured in the quote from past president Dr. Marc Gabel, who told the college counsel, “You cannot kick someone out of your office without care” — a slanderous mischaracterization of physicians who wish to bow out of the referral process for abortion and doctor-assisted killing. The vote took place the same day the Canadian Medical Association reportedly defended a physician’s right not to be forced to refer against his/her moral beliefs.

Unacceptable to force doctors to participate in assisted dying against their conscience

Legalized physician-assisted death will usher in such a fundamental change in practice “we simply cannot accept a system that compels physicians to go against their conscience as individuals on something so profound as this,” CMA president Chris Simpson said in an exclusive interview.

Today’s letters: On assisted suicide, ‘the SCC has done its job, now it’s Parliament’s turn’

Yes, the Supreme Court decision mirrors public opinion on assisted suicide. Unfortunately public opinion is ill-informed. Three years ago, our elected MPs showed that they had thought more deeply about the subject than our judges. Showing considerable courage, they defied public opinion and overwhelmingly rejected a bill to legalize assisted suicide. I have been personally touched by this issue. Twenty years ago my terminally ill father asked me to help him kill himself. He didn’t want to be a burden. I pointed out that those he loved would be greatly saddened if he did this. Fortunately a skilled physician managed his pain and he was able to die a dignified, peaceful death.

Ian Gentles, Toronto.

Published in the National Post
Letters | February 17, 2015 | Last Updated: Feb 17 6:00 AM ET